- Office of Research and Sponsored Programs
- Cayuse
- post-award
- Pre-Award
- Compliance
- Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
- Institutional Review Board
- IRB News & Updates
- IRB Meeting Schedule and Submission Deadlines
- Frequently Asked Questions
- IRB helpful tips
- Does My Research Require Review?
- IRB Forms & Templates
- Protocol Submission
- Review Categories
- Review Process
- Review Decisions
- Criteria for Approval or Suspension of Research
- Normal Educational Practices Considered Exempt From Full Committee Review
- How to Facilitate IRB Protocol Review
- Issues of Special Concern
- Complete Protocol Package
- Protocol Guidelines
- How to Obtain Consent
- Elements of Voluntary Informed Consent
- Guidelines for Obtaining Assent from Minors
- Human Subjects Research Training Course
- Modification Review
- Continuation Review
- Adverse Events
- Protocol Deviation/Violation
- Use of Deception in Research
- Understanding Reliance Agreements
- Other Resources
- IRB Membership (2024-2025)
- Centers and Institutes at CSUEB
- Policies, Procedures, and Resources
- Forms Library
- Reports
- Training
- Monitoring Tools
- Expertise Directory
Issues of Special Concern
Exempt Research
Some types of research include issues that can increase the risk to participants. If issues of special concern are present, even exempt protocols may warrant more scrutiny than usual. These issues include:
- Power Imbalances
- Employee/workplace issues (will the employer see the data?)
- Teacher/student issues (can a teacher’s class research be truly voluntary?)
- Sensitive Topics or Questions, such as:
- Sexuality (federally-designated as a sensitive topic due to the possibility of stigmatization of subjects)
- Health (Cancer, HIV/AIDS – healthcare/insurance issues)
- Alcohol or Drug Use (illegal use of alcohol or drugs in minors, or illegal substance abuse issues)
This doesn’t mean such research cannot take place. It means that the reviewers will confirm that the researcher has taken these issues into account by mentioning them in the risks section, and by taking steps to lessen the risk. One way to lessen the risk is to let the participants know there will be no penalty if they decline to participate.
For instance, a teacher’s student assent for members of her own class would assure the students that their grade in the class would not be affected by their decision whether or not to participate in the research. A researcher in the workplace would assure employees that their manager would see only aggregated results of a survey, not the original data, so their responses would be kept confidential.
In the health examples, maintaining the confidentiality of the data will be of great importance: how will the data will be coded, stored, accessed, analyzed and disposed of? How will the participants’ privacy be best protected?
Non-Exempt Research
In non-exempt research, the office will make sure that all steps have been taken to protect the participants in:
- Focus groups (it is hard to maintain confidentiality with so many people; the researcher must verbally remind all participants to keep the discussion material confidential to protect everyone’s privacy.)
- Deceptive research (the use of deception must be justified by the researcher in the protocol, be practiced only on Psychology students, and include a debriefing session in which participants are given the opportunity to refuse to let their data be used.)
The presence of issues of special concern does not mean the research cannot be conducted. Rather, the IRB will confirm that the investigator is aware of the issues and is willing to correct any bias that he/she has not considered. In these cases, the subject’s privacy becomes even more important, and the confidentiality of the data must be maintained even more rigorously. Contact the office if you have questions.